High Court Judge, His Lordship Justice Alexander Osei Tutu contends that the tradition of women adopting their husband's names has lost its relevance in modern times.
He points to legislative changes that have liberated women from historical constraints, enabling them to live and act independently without being under their husband's coverture.
In an interview with Joy News on The Law, Justice Osei Tutu explained that, “For many years women have been subdued and that people don’t know when they use Mrs. If you marry under the ordinance it's presume that you must change your name and adopt the name of your husband.
"The question I ask is, what is the relevance of adopting your husband's name now? Women should have their own identity. In the past, women adopted their husband's names because the law required it for certain activities, but now women can do everything independently,” he said.
He asserted that early first-century beliefs did not include this practice. ”As I said, it is an English custom that was intended to demean women. However, its significance has diminished, and we need to reconsider adopting 'Mrs.' and using the husband's name. Even in Islam, it is not permitted," he said.
He explained, "If you want to use the Bible to justify it, you may also get it wrong as nowhere in the Bible does it state that a woman must change her name upon marriage.”
He explained that coverture laws historically prevented married women from performing lawful acts independently. “Women could not do anything without their husbands,” he stated.
Mr. Osei Tutu noted that this rule persisted for many centuries until legislation in the 19th century began empowering women to act independently. "For example, the Married Women's Property Act allows women to hold property in their own names. Even in the U.S., until 1930, women could not obtain passports without their husbands. There were many things the law did not allow women to do."
“But fortunately, all these disabilities have been lifted. Women can now do everything independently," he added. "So it is not biblical, it is not Islamic, and legally, it has lost its relevance.”
Latest Stories
-
We need to work to bring Mali, Niger & Burkina Faso back to ECOWAS – Akufo-Addo
43 mins -
President Akufo-Addo says security in Sahel has ‘worsened’ since French troops left
2 hours -
Their behaviour landed them in trouble – Akufo-Addo justifies detention of anti-Galamsey protestors
3 hours -
Alan Kyerematen urges Ghanaians to reject vote-buying tactics
3 hours -
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints supports Wusuta Health Center in North Dayi district
4 hours -
MTN Ghana donates to Asogli Traditional area at 2024 Asogli Yam Festival
4 hours -
MTN holds annual Editors’ forum
7 hours -
Osman Ayariga accuses Akufo-Addo of lack of commitment in galamsey fight
7 hours -
NPP is best suited to manage Ghana’s education sector, not NDC – NAPO claims
7 hours -
Bloggers will play a key role in Bawumia’s vision for economic transformation – Joseph Cudjoe
7 hours -
Religion shouldn’t influence elections – NAPO urges
7 hours -
Bono Regional Chief Imam urges politicians to control their emotions ahead of December 7 polls
7 hours -
Kindergarten teacher adjudged 2024 Ghana’s Most Outstanding Teacher
7 hours -
Time stood still, Trump says at site of assassination attempt
8 hours -
Akufo-Addo intensifies stakeholder engagement to combat ‘Galamsey’ activities
8 hours