Executive Director of the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), Sulemana Braimah, says Ghanaians need to admit that every sector and institution is becoming quite partisan.
He was speaking in reference to comments made by former president, John Dramani Mahama, at the NDC Lawyers’ Conference where he said the Akufo-Addo administration has packed the bench with judges politically inclined to the NPP.
According to Sulemana Braimah, the former president should not be chastised for commenting on a ‘worrying’ trend, as such comments and questions are needed to protect the sanctity of the judiciary.
“I think that we need to admit that increasingly every sector of our society, every state institution is getting quite partisan and that must be worrying to all of us. And for the judiciary, I often say that when we lose the judiciary it will be the end of our democracy and perhaps the end of our progress. So it is important that we protect the sanctity of our judiciary.
“But the protection of it is not to criticize it when we see things going wrong. If indeed what we’re observing is increasing appointment and packing the courts with those who are inclined to a particular political tradition then we need to say it just as it is said in the US and I believe elsewhere,” he said.
He, however, noted that John Mahama’s comment on balancing the bench with NDC judges was not the right call, rather the entrenchment of the same problem he had identified.
“I think my only problem with the former president’s statement was to say that what we are observing is wrong and when I get the chance to come to power, I would also do the same wrong thing. I think that is what I find fundamentally wrong.
“But for people to accuse him of raising the question about how judges may be of a certain political orientation are getting appointed to the court, I think that is fair, I think we need to have real debate about that,” he said.
To buttress his earlier point, he cited a study carried out by Professor Atuguba which showed that judges were likely to rule in line with the political inclination of their appointing authority in political cases.
Thus the NPP administration stuffing the bench was indeed a matter of concern.
“If you remember in 2018 I think, the revered Professor Raymond Atuguba did a study looking at about a 100 cases that he classified as political cases, and at the end the conclusion was that when you look at the cases and the judges who sat on the cases and who appointed those judges, the conclusion was you’d find that the judgements are always tilted towards the inclinations of those who appointed them. And so we cannot rule it out that that is not a problem we need to talk about and that is the only way we can protect the sanctity of the judiciary,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
I want to focus more on my education – Chidimma Adetshina quits pageantry
3 hours -
Priest replaced after Sabrina Carpenter shoots music video in his church
3 hours -
Duct-taped banana artwork sells for $6.2m in NYC
4 hours -
Arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas commander over alleged war crimes
4 hours -
Actors Jonathan Majors and Meagan Good are engaged
4 hours -
Expired rice saga: A ‘best before date’ can be extended – Food and Agriculture Engineer
4 hours -
Why I rejected Range Rover gift from a man – Tiwa Savage
4 hours -
KNUST Engineering College honours Telecel Ghana CEO at Alumni Excellence Awards
4 hours -
Postecoglou backs Bentancur appeal after ‘mistake’
5 hours -
#Manifesto debate: NDC to enact and pass National Climate Law – Prof Klutse
5 hours -
‘Everything a manager could wish for’ – Guardiola signs new deal
5 hours -
TEWU suspends strike after NLC directive, urges swift resolution of grievances
5 hours -
Netflix debuts Grain Media’s explosive film
6 hours -
‘Expired’ rice scandal: FDA is complicit; top officials must be fired – Ablakwa
6 hours -
#TheManifestoDebate: We’ll provide potable water, expand water distribution network – NDC
6 hours