The Supreme Court has, in a unanimous decision, dismissed a case filed by former Director-General of the Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT), Ernest Thompson.
The court turned down his request to set aside two Special Audit Reports on the operation of an Operational Business Suite acquired by SSNIT.
Mr. Thompson is accused of causing a $14.8 million loss to the state through the acquisition and use of the suite.
The former SSNIT boss had told an Accra High Court that the two audit reports which made damning and adverse findings against him were compiled by SSNIT without an opportunity for him to respond to it.
This he insisted breached his right to a fair hearing. He, therefore, wanted the court to restrain the Attorney-General from presenting the said reports or using them.
The High Court ruled in favor of the Attorney-General. It noted that the rule on the need for a fair hearing only applies where a person is entitled to be heard because they have a right to be heard.
The Court said there cannot be a breach when such a right does not exist.
The Court noted that at the time the report was issued, Mr. Thompson was no longer an employee of SSNIT and that SSNIT could not impose sanctions on him.
It described the two documents as opinions of experts which were not binding even on a judge in a criminal trial.
Mr. Thompson then proceeded to the Court of Appeal to challenge the decision of the High Court. He insisted that once the Court found that he was not given a fair hearing, it should have restrained the Attorney-General from using the reports.
The Court of Appeal however affirmed the High Court's decision indicating that SSNIT had not taken any step against Mr. Thompson on the basis of the audit report. The former SSNIT Boss then took the matter to the Supreme Court. The Apex court said the audit report carried no decision-making weight.
It additionally noted that Mr. Thompson had the opportunity to respond to the audit report through a letter written to him by the Economic and Organized Crime Office. The EOCO letter, the Court noted, attached a document which was effectively an extract of the two reports in contention.
The Court, therefore, dismissed the case filed by Mr. Thompson, awarding a cost of 5,000 cedis against him.
See full decision below:
Latest Stories
-
Akomadan Omanhene praises Bawumia as empathetic and visionary
58 seconds -
Excessive partisanship is Ghana’s problem; transformative leadership is the solution – Alan Kyerematen
12 mins -
NDC accuses NPP of attempting to block GFP’s ballot re-entry to alter positions
12 mins -
Alan Kyerematen is the situational leader Ghana needs at this critical time – Boniface Siddique
24 mins -
Speaker to address media on recent developments in Parliament, other issues on Wednesday
24 mins -
#Eleection2024: It’s a collective responsibility to maintain peace – Asogli Queen
29 mins -
Bawku conflict claims 61-year-old man, raising death toll to 22
35 mins -
Ghana’s education system stifles critical thinking, innovation – Sam Jonah
40 mins -
“Pay us our royalties” – Celestine Donkor’s manager to Boomplay
47 mins -
Ghana’s overlooked cocoa farmers: The key to a fair and sustainable cocoa industry
1 hour -
Napo urges Seikwa to reject NDC, accuses Asiedu Nketiah of rejecting his hometown
1 hour -
MTN Foundation empowers Volta Region entrepreneurs to drive Ghana’s economic transformation
1 hour -
Sam Jonah criticises reliance on past questions, calls for education reform
2 hours -
Abronye lauds Napo’s impact in Bono Region
2 hours -
Election 2024: Confusion rocks GFP as 2 factions send contradictory letters to EC
2 hours