https://www.myjoyonline.com/sovereign-default-at-record-high-ghana-zambia-among-countries-significantly-affected-fitch/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/sovereign-default-at-record-high-ghana-zambia-among-countries-significantly-affected-fitch/

There have been 14 separate default events since 2020, across nine different sovereigns, Fitch Ratings has disclosed in a new report.

This is a marked increase compared with 19 defaults across 13 different countries between 2000 and 2019.

A record five Fitch-rated sovereigns are in default. That includes Belarus, Lebanon, Ghana, Sri Lanka and Zambia

Moreover, Fitch rated eight sovereigns at ‘CCC+’ or below, and a further nine at ‘B-’.

The average cumulative five-year default rate between 1995 and 2021 for sovereigns rated ‘C’ to ‘CCC+’ by Fitch was 40.6%.

According to the report, the median general government debt/Gross Domestic Product ratio of Fitch-rated sovereigns rose steadily from 31% in 2008 to 48% pre-Covid-19 pandemic, facilitated by frontier markets’ easier access to the Eurobond market and borrowing from China.

Against this backdrop, frontier markets with limited buffers were said to be poorly placed to cope with the severe shocks from the pandemic and the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on food and energy prices, global inflation and the subsequent abrupt tightening in monetary policy.

“On average, sovereign defaults in 2020-2022 are taking longer to resolve, albeit they constitute a limited sample size”, it added.

The report further said the median duration of defaults for Fitch-rated sovereigns since 2020 is 107 days (and five are uncured) compared with 35 days for all defaults since 2000.

“Slow restructurings do not serve the interests of either debtors or creditors, and add to the cost of financing”, it explained.

Common Framework no proving effective in resolving crisis

Fitch concluded that the Common Framework was intended to facilitate creditor coordination but, so far, is not proving effective in resolving crises quickly.

Widespread reports indicate that a key reason for delays is weak coordination among Chinese stakeholders, and China’s demands that multilateral debt is included in debt restructuring and that there are no haircuts, just maturity reprofiling.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.