A lawyer representing Kennedy Agyapong has filed a motion urging the court to drastically reduce the $18 million verdict awarded to investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas, calling it “clearly excessive” and “shocking to the judicial conscience.”
In a letter to Judge Jeffrey B. Beacham, attorney E. Carter Corriston, Jr. argued that the damages awarded were not based on actual losses or competent evidence, but rather on emotionally charged arguments made by Anas’ lawyer.
“The award of compensatory damages of $18 million returned in 30 minutes clearly breaches the threshold of ‘shocking the conscience,’ even viewing it in a light most favorable to the plaintiff,” Mr Corriston wrote.
Mr Corriston insisted that Anas failed to prove that Mr Agyapong’s statements caused him any real financial or emotional harm.
“The plaintiff presented no experts, no witnesses, and no testimony from himself about any emotional damage that would justify the verdict,” the letter stated.
The lawyer further accused Anas’ counsel of introducing irrelevant and prejudicial evidence to sway the jury, including references to the murder of journalist Ahmed Hussein-Suale and alleged judicial corruption in Ghana.
“These were severely prejudicial and not relevant to the claims regarding defamation that occurred in West Orange,” Mr Corriston wrote.
“There was no evidence presented regarding actual losses the plaintiff suffered as a result of the statements.”
Mr Corriston argued that the jury’s decision was not a fair compensatory award but rather an emotional response aimed at punishing Mr Agyapong.
“The entire tenor of the testimony and closing arguments was not about compensatory damages but rather to ‘stop the defendant,’” he stated, arguing that such rhetoric had tainted the jury’s decision-making process.
He also took issue with the speed of the verdict, noting that the jury reached its decision in just 30 minutes, which, he said, proved that “emotion, not evidence, drove the shocking verdict.”
While Mr Corriston did not seek to overturn the jury’s finding of liability, he insisted that the court must correct the injustice of a verdict that “has no rational relationship to the competent and relevant evidence presented.”
“The proper remedy at this time is the grant of remittitur to an amount that is fairly and reasonably calculated to compensate the plaintiff for the harm that was proven,” he concluded.
The motion, if granted, could significantly reduce the $18 million awarded to Anas in the high-profile defamation case.
Latest Stories
-
Ghanaian wins 2025 Johns Hopkins Community Service Award for public health leadership
8 minutes -
Asiedu Nketia says choosing DCEs among party members is politically dangerous
2 hours -
Sholay: Bollywood epic roars back to big screen after 50 years with new ending
2 hours -
World’s oldest boomerang doesn’t actually come back
3 hours -
UK to host Trump for full state visit later this year
3 hours -
Deadly airbag fault sees 2.5m cars recalled in France
4 hours -
Burial of Zambia’s ex-president in South Africa halted at last minute by court
4 hours -
Asiedu Nketia says EC with Jean Mensa at helm ‘Must be reset’
4 hours -
‘The entire EC leadership must go; they are not fit for purpose’ – Asiedu Nketia
4 hours -
Banks record GH¢4.3bn profit in April 2025
5 hours -
Banks shareholders’ funds grew by 42.6% to GH¢43.9bn in April 2025
5 hours -
Banks NPL declined to 23.6%, but total NPL stood at GH¢21.7bn in April 2025 – BoG
5 hours -
‘This EC is not fit for purpose’ – Asiedu Nketia demands EC overhaul
5 hours -
Government must build a second CBM to enable vessels discharge quickly, eliminate Leycan bureaucracy – COMAC Chairman
5 hours -
At least eight killed and hundreds hurt as Kenya protesters battle police
6 hours