The December 17 Referendum is officially off the books as Parliament okays the withdrawal of the Constitutional Instrument by the Attorney-General, Gloria Akuffo.
JoyNews Parliamentary Correspondent, Kwesi Parker-Wilson reported Monday that, the promise by President Nana Akufo-Addo to withdraw the bill, was made good when the A-G prayed the House to give her leave to withdraw the said CI which was subsequently granted by First Deputy Speaker, Joe Osei Owusu.
The amendment, until the withdrawal, would have given the electorate power to elect Metropolitan Municipal and District Chief Executives (MMDCEs).
A referendum to be held some two weeks from now, would have also introduced partisan politics at the local government level.
But President Akufo-Addo in a televised address to the nation Sunday night aborted processes for the referendum and indicated that, the Local Government Ministry will officially withdraw it on the floor of the House.
“It is with deep regrets that I have given instructions to the Minister of Local Government and Rural Development who will spear this process on behalf of government with commendable vigour and dynamism to abort the process and seek the withdrawal of the Bills for the amendment of the constitution both in respect of Article 243(1) and Article 55(3),” the President stated.
“In these circumstances, I am convinced that it will not serve the public interest to go ahead with the holding of the referendum on the December 17, even though I believe that a strong campaign for a Yes vote would have succeeded,” President Akufo-Addo stated.
But that move was described by Minority Leader, Haruna Iddrisu, as unconstitutional.
Haruna Iddrisu, who is also the Tamale South MP, accused the President of lynching the constitution by withdrawing the said CI.
Meanwhile, Majority Leader, Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsu, has countered the argument of the Minority.
At a joint press briefing addressed by the Attorney-General, Local Government Minister and the Majority Leader, the three Ministers argued that the President did nothing unconstitutional by withdrawing the CI.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Spanish PM sorry for corruption scandal as opposition demands resignation
1 hour -
British man is only passenger to survive India plane crash
1 hour -
NSS ghost saga: Deputy AG Srem Sai says suspects willing to return over ¢560m and testify
1 hour -
NSS ghost names saga: Investigative report fingers 22 with over ¢560m set for recovery
2 hours -
GFA relieves Desmond Ofei as Black Satellites coach, focuses him on Black Stars
2 hours -
What does the Air India crash mean for Boeing?
3 hours -
US senator dragged out of LA immigration news conference
3 hours -
US orders 500,000 citizens of four countries to leave
3 hours -
Republic Day must be protected: A nation must not forget its true birth
3 hours -
Passion to Pouring: First luxury cocktail and music tasting experience debuts in Ho
3 hours -
Volta Okada Riders Association charts path for stronger leadership and legal recognition
4 hours -
Zoomlion contract: We don’t need a middleman – Manasseh urges assemblies to take control of sanitation
4 hours -
RFK Jr appoints new US vaccine advisers after sacking committee
4 hours -
Youth group urge Ghana Water Company to commission Damongo Water Project, condemns partisan delays
4 hours -
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyer makes his ex-girlfriend read loving texts until she cries
4 hours