The Principal Investigator at the Merian Institute of Advanced Studies in Africa (MIASA), Dr. Chika Mba, has sparked conversation by highlighting a distinction between academic freedom and what he calls "academic peace" in Ghana.
According to Dr. Mba, while scholars and academics in the country operate in an environment that allows for critique and intellectual discourse, they are limited in their ability to challenge government policies openly and freely.
Speaking at a MIASA-MECAM roundtable discussion on “Academic Freedom and Research Ethics: Exploring Dynamics in Ghana, Tunisia, and Germany,” Dr. Mba emphasised that true academic freedom remains elusive in Ghana.
He explained that academics can voice dissenting views, but only within a boundary that avoids direct confrontation with political power.
In his view, this creates an atmosphere of academic peace rather than genuine academic freedom, as scholars tread cautiously in their critiques.
He further pointed out that academic freedom in Ghana is often confused with institutional autonomy, even though the two concepts differ.
Historical events, such as university leadership being tied to government appointments—from Dr. Kwame Nkrumah's era to the structural adjustment policies of the late Jerry John Rawlings—demonstrate that academia in Ghana has faced periods of restricted freedom.
The discussion also brought in perspectives from other regions. Prof. Emma Beitaief, Vice President of the University of Tunis and Principal Investigator at the Merian Centre for Advanced Studies in the Maghreb (MECAM), shared Tunisia’s experience.
She noted that academic freedom was tightly controlled until the 2011 revolution, which led to a more open academic environment.
In contrast, Germany’s MECAM Director, Prof. Rashid Quaissa, called for creativity in research under authoritarian regimes, stressing the need for scholars to simplify complex issues and engage the public through media for societal development.
In Ghana, the debate on academic freedom is especially pertinent as scholars grapple with contentious issues such as illegal mining, commonly known as “galamsey.” Prof. Joseph Awetori Yaro, Provost of the College of Humanities at the University of Ghana, urged academics to prioritise ethical standards in their work.
He questioned whether scholars should remain silent about destructive practices like illegal mining simply because of political affiliations or government appointments.
Ultimately, the roundtable underscored that academic freedom is essential for national development. Scholars must be free not only to pursue intellectual curiosity but also to address real-world problems for the benefit of society.
Latest Stories
-
I’ve learnt to be vigilant – Ras Deportee on anti-galamsey arrest
32 seconds -
Shop attendant gave car keys to Salifu Amoako’s 16-year-old son to drive – Prosecution to court
9 mins -
EC’s basis for disqualifying our Amenfi Central PC extremely mischievous – NDC
30 mins -
Afenyo-Markin rushed to Supreme Court because he doesn’t want to be Minority Leader – John Jinapor
41 mins -
Asamoah Gyan postpones All Regional Games to 2025
1 hour -
Speaker to rule on petition to Dismiss 4 MPs today
2 hours -
NPA announces new price floor for petroleum products
2 hours -
Fuel price increase: Petrol at GH₵14.49, diesel going for GH₵14.90
2 hours -
Our national youth teams have collapsed – Agyemang-Badu on Black Stars struggles
2 hours -
Ghanaian scholars experience academic peace, not freedom – MIASA Investigator
3 hours -
Election 2024: Bawumia will secure one-touch victory; there won’t be any run-off – NAPO
3 hours -
Engagement! Discourse! Action! Mastering the art of ending UTAG strikes
3 hours -
Today’s front pages: Thursday, October 17, 2024
4 hours -
Mahama begins phase 4 tour of Greater Accra today
4 hours -
NDC Amenfi Central PC Joana Gyan ‘fights’ EC’s decision to disqualify her
4 hours