Member of Parliament for Bawku Central, Mahama Ayariga, has raised concerns over the level of judicial involvement in matters he deems political, following the Supreme Court’s decision to issue a stay of execution on Speaker Alban Bagbin’s ruling that declared four parliamentary seats vacant.
Speaking on JoyNews’ The Probe on Sunday, October 20, Mr Ayariga emphasised the need for judges with extensive legal knowledge at the Supreme Court, pointing to international precedents where courts have refrained from getting entangled in politically charged disputes.
“That is why you should have knowledgeable people as judges at the Supreme Court. We should have judges who know their law,” he said, referencing the 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case Baker v. Carr.
He noted that in this landmark case, the U.S. court ruled that there are certain matters inherently political, which are best left to the legislature and executive branches to resolve without judicial interference.
Mr Ayariga argued that the Ghanaian Supreme Court should have followed a similar approach.
"If they were knowledgeable, they would have known that the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Baker and Carr in 1968, said that ‘there are certain matters that are by their nature political within the domain of the legislature and the executive.’"
The ruling Mr Ayariga referred to arose from Speaker Bagbin’s decision to declare four seats vacant after MPs either opted to contest the 2024 elections as independent candidates or switched party allegiances.
This sparked a legal battle, culminating in the Supreme Court's intervention, which halted Mr Bagbin's ruling.
Mr Ayariga expressed frustration over the court’s swift decision to intervene without granting a hearing to both sides.
“...the Supreme Court hurriedly meets and issues a stay of execution to the Speaker without even hearing the other side.”
He warned that such judicial involvement could lead to clashes between the legislature, executive, and judiciary.
"Else there would be these kinds of clashes where the legislature would say one thing and the Supreme Court would say another. Where the Executive would say one thing and the Supreme Court would say another."
There's divided opinion over Speaker Bagbin's declaration as well as the reaction by the Supreme Court.
One of the critics, a private legal practitioner, Kwame Akuffo, is of the view that the Supreme Court erred.
Latest Stories
-
2024/25 GPL match report: Berekum Chelsea extends unbeaten run with 3-1 victory over Legon Cities
12 mins -
Let us keep working hard for decisive victory in December – Bawumia urges
50 mins -
I’m for inclusive development for all – Bawumia declares, as he starts tour of Volta Region
59 mins -
Ghana needs knowledgeable judges in its Supreme Court – Mahama Ayariga
1 hour -
Parliament makes laws, it doesn’t interpret them – Sam Okudzeto
1 hour -
Bawumia is the visionary to lead Ghana into a prosperous digital future – Samira
2 hours -
Hannah Ashade rallies women for historic election campaign at 2024 NPP Volta Regional Women’s Conference
2 hours -
One injured in attack on Tolon Chief who allegedly endorsed Bawumia and cursed NDC
2 hours -
Musk to give away $1m per day to Pennsylvania voters
3 hours -
At least 87 killed in strike on northern Gaza, officials say, as UN warns ‘nowhere is safe’
3 hours -
Egypt declared malaria-free after 100-year effort
3 hours -
Livestream: The Probe discusses Ghana’s parliamentary seat vacancies and preventing political chaos
3 hours -
150 persons to benefit from MTN SMEs support programme
3 hours -
‘It was an accident; my son did not carry a gun to kill anybody’ – Salifu Amoako
3 hours -
2024/25 GPL: Vision FC and Bechem United play to a 1-1 draw in Tema
4 hours