https://www.myjoyonline.com/ecs-inconsistent-actions-fuel-public-dissatisfaction-clara-kasser-tee/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR06Ryf00Nw_reoiSnij0c_6qs2FYP0UtBPxMH31be89Va3-4k5n3F0g-Wg_aem_ov9OP1vSDmOUhgkdebgO7g-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/ecs-inconsistent-actions-fuel-public-dissatisfaction-clara-kasser-tee/

A private legal practitioner and law lecturer, Clara Beeri Kasser-Tee, has criticised the Electoral Commission (EC) for inconsistencies in its handling of disputed election results, warning that such actions undermine public trust.

Speaking on Joy News’ Newsfile, she argued that the EC’s approach leaves room for dissatisfaction and questions about its impartiality.

Her comments come after the Supreme Court quashed results in the re-collation of votes in Tema Central, Ablekuma North, Techiman South, and Okaikwei Central in the 2024 parliamentary elections.

The apex court added that the order does not affect Ahafo Ano North and Nsawam Adoagyiri results.

According to the court, the trial judge violated the right to a hearing of the NDC Parliamentary Candidates when they applied to the High Court.

Read also: Re-collation: Supreme Court quashes results in Tema Central, Ablekuma North, Techiman South, Okaikwei Central

Commenting on the re-collation exercise undertaken by the EC, she stated, “If you say this is the only circumstance under which we do re-collation, but in another instance, you act differently and fail to demonstrate the distinction, you create room for people to be dissatisfied.”

Mrs Kasser-Tee highlighted that the EC’s decisions must be consistent and transparent, especially when addressing allegations of irregularities.

“For me, it’s the procedure that is important. When there is clarity and consistency in the process, disputes often don’t even arise,” she said.

She also questioned the EC’s reluctance to address allegations in court, noting the absence of an affidavit in opposition to claims against it.

“I was curious why the EC didn’t oppose these allegations in court. If you are amenable to doing what you are supposed to do, why not demonstrate it? People shouldn’t need to go through the expense of litigation to get the EC to act,” she said.

Mrs Kasser-Tee emphasized that fairness and impartiality are crucial for the EC to maintain credibility.

“When you treat everybody fairly and give everyone an opportunity to be heard, they may not always be happy with your decision, but they will respect it,” she explained.

She urged the EC to prioritise consistency and transparency, warning that deviations from these principles could erode public confidence in its operations.

“The EC must demonstrate clearly that its actions are grounded in law and fairness. Anything less invites unnecessary dissatisfaction,” she concluded.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.