Former Deputy Attorney General, Dr Dominic Ayine has questioned the independence of the judiciary due to the manner the Supreme Court adjudicated the 2020 election petition.
According to him, the Supreme Court’s failure to apply the rules of procedure as well as the consistent and continuous dismissal of petitioner’s applications or reliefs are the basis of his assertion.
“Adjudication is the process of accountability. So for me, it is okay to dismiss an application brought by a petitioner for one relief or the other whether substantive or procedural.
"But it is another thing to fail to apply the rules of procedure in a manner that enhances the accountability process. So at the end of the day, the petition actually dampened my hopes with respect to the independence of the judiciary and its ability to hold the Electoral Commission, in particular, accountable in election petitions,” he stressed.
The Bolga East MP was part of the panel at a CDD-Ghana Roundtable Discussion on 'Presidential Election Petitions and their Impact on Africa's Democracy'.
Mr Ayine who was a member of John Mahama’s legal team that challenged the 2020 election results, noted that one of the things he found disturbing as a lawyer was the lack of reason offered by the apex court for dismissing the petition.
He added that he expected the Supreme Court to be more faithful to legal precedent and also to be more open in the application of the law for the purposes of holding the Electoral Commission accountable.
“I expected the Supreme Court to apply faithfully the rules of procedure to - in terms of adducing evidence - prove the petitioner's case and so on. What we saw was a Supreme Court that was constantly putting hurdles in the way of the petitioner in terms of adducing evidence to prove the petitioner's case.
“I am sure for ordinary Ghanaians or the electorate generally, the fact that the Supreme Court judges - all nine of them - on almost every application was unanimous in rejecting and dismissing the case of the petitioner was very telling in terms of the open-mindedness or otherwise of the Justices as far the petition was concerned and for me as a Lawyer,” he added.
He said the fact that the notice to admit fact was filed and served on the petitioner and the court went silent on it, is very telling about the independence of the judiciary.
Dr Ayine added that irresistible inferences can be drawn from “the conduct of the case about the independence of the judges”.
Latest Stories
-
64% of CEOs in Ghana optimistic firms will thrive beyond next decade if… – PwC Report
9 seconds -
NPP vs. EC: A Dance of Convenience?
6 minutes -
Gold Stars announce Appiah McCarthy, Roland Frimpong contract extensions
10 minutes -
Abuakwa South MP mourns the passing of Ernest Kumi
19 minutes -
It’s not too late; let’s work together to fix the broken EC – Omane Boamah to NPP
28 minutes -
You should’ve listened when we raised red flags about the EC – Omane Boamah to NPP
41 minutes -
Hassan Ayariga opposes alleged attempt to establish Nigerian kingdom in Ghana
42 minutes -
Ablekuma North: Are EC leaders trying to save their jobs because NDC threatens to remove them? – Nana B asks
55 minutes -
Today’s Front pages: Wednesday, July 9, 2025
1 hour -
NPP questions EC and police role in Ablekuma North election
1 hour -
Construction of 24-Hour-Economy market starts soon on Jema-Kintampo highway
1 hour -
‘It’s collation, not rerun’ – Justin Kodua fires at EC over Ablekuma North dispute
2 hours -
NPP drags EC to court for contempt in Ablekuma North dispute
3 hours -
Musk’s AI firm says it’s removing ‘inappropriate’ chatbot posts
3 hours -
We have done our part in preserving cedi’s true value – BoG Governor
4 hours