Many doctors recommend treatments to their patients that they would not use themselves, a US study suggests.
Experts asked nearly 1,000 US physicians to consider a medical scenario and pick a treatment.
But when doctors were asked to imagine themselves as the patient their answers differed significantly.
Doctors were far more likely to opt for a therapy carrying a higher chance of death but better odds of side-effect free survival, for example.
But for their patients, doctors tended to pick a treatment that erred on the side of survival, regardless of the quality of life, Archives of Internal
Death risk
Faced with a choice of one of two operations to treat bowel cancer, for example, two-fifths of 242 physicians chose the surgical procedure with a higher rate of death, but a lower rate of adverse effects.
Conversely, when asked to make a recommendation for a patient, only a quarter of physicians chose this option.
In another scenario, doctors were asked to imagine that either themselves or a patient was infected with a new case of bird flu.
They were told a drug treatment was available, and that without this treatment a person who contracted flu would have a 10% risk of death and 30% risk of needing hospital care.
Treatment would halve the rate of adverse events but also caused death in 1% of patients and permanent neurological paralysis in 4%.
Of nearly 700 doctors, about two-thirds chose to forgo the treatment when imagining they had been infected, to avoid its adverse effects.
However, when imagining that a patient had been infected, only half recommended not taking the treatment.
Dr Peter Ubel, from Duke University, North Carolina, and colleagues say: "When physicians make treatment recommendations, they think differently than when making decisions for themselves."
What is not clear is which is the best way to reach a treatment decision - putting yourself in the shoes of another or not.
Indeed, today doctors are often discouraged from giving their own personal opinion and instead are encouraged to present the relevant evidence and information so that the patient can make the choice for themselves.
"Our study does not suggest that physicians always make better decisions for others than they would make for themselves.
"At most, our study suggests that in some circumstances, the act of making a recommendation might improve decision making," say the researchers.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
Latest Stories
-
Donewell Life Assurance rebrands to Pinnacle Life Insurance: A new era of excellence
6 mins -
NDC blames ECG’s poor revenue collection for energy sector challenges
8 mins -
MEST Africa, Mastercard Foundation celebrate EdTech Innovations at Demo Day in Accra
13 mins -
AWA reaffirms commitment with FOD Walk during Safety Week
17 mins -
Kuami Eugene hopeful he’ll be first Lynx artiste to survive after leaving the label
28 mins -
Akufo-Addo seeks to use Bawumia to complete Akyem agenda – Asiedu Nketia alleges
30 mins -
National Cathedral: CHRAJ recommends investigation, contract cancellation, possible prosecution
34 mins -
Dr James Orleans-Lindsay wins Man of the Year at 9th EMY Africa Awards
36 mins -
Medical Council to enforce specialist distribution nationwide
1 hour -
Fire guts old Fadama market, man reportedly loses GHC800,000
1 hour -
Nacee bemoans low performance fees for gospel artistes
1 hour -
We don’t operate investment platform – GNPC
1 hour -
Ghana Fact-checking Coalition condemns disinformation on voting by Wontumi FM broadcaster
1 hour -
IFRS 17 will augment and accelerate NIC’s efforts to implement risk-based capital – Deloitte
2 hours -
IFRS 17 is one of biggest changes to financial reporting standards in insurance industry – Deloitte
2 hours