Private Legal Practitioner, Justin Pwavra Teriwajah has said that Sections 207 and 208 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), should not be misconstrued as the creeping back into the country’s jurisprudence, by the repealed Criminal Libel Law.
According to him, Sections 207 and 208, and the criminal libel law are very much different in terms of purpose and application.
Speaking on JoyNews’ The Law, he noted that whereas the Criminal Libel Law was purposely meant to protect public office holders from libel and defamatory comments, Sections 207 and 208 applies to all and sundry.
He said, “The repealed provisions clearly concerned libel, and I can read the definition of defamatory matter in Section 114, Sub-section 1 of the repealed provision, it says a matter is defamatory which impugns to a person, any crime or misconduct in any public office, or which is likely to injure him in his occupation, calling or office, or to expose him to general hatred, contempt or ridicule.”
Citing a decided case, he added, “So even in that particular case of the Republic vs Thompson Books limited, the issue was Nana Konadu Agyeman Rawlings was the first lady back then, and there was a defamatory matter published against her for which reason the Thompson Books Limited among others were being prosecuted. Now the matter went to Supreme Court and the issue was whether Nana Konadu Agyeman Rawlings qualified as a public officer.”
According to him, should the Criminal Libel Law still be in force now, it would most likely be used to protect the President, but Sections 207 and 208 can be used to protect the ordinary Ghanaian.
“So when you look at it clearly, the Criminal Libel Law had a particular objective and focus, which is clearly missing in Sections 207 and 208. Now the President as we speak today, is the number one public officer, so if the Criminal Libel Law were still in force, then clearly, that could have been used to protect him.
“But the provisions that we are talking about today, Sections 207 and 208, there is no requirement of protection of a public officer from being defamed. So in the first place clearly, when you compare the two, there is a very clear difference.
“One clearly concerns the defamation of a public officer, this one is a general law that can protect any Ghanaian. And for me, I don’t see Sections 207 and 208 as necessarily being about defamation and libel and things like that,” he explained.
Latest Stories
-
We may all resort to vote buying if electorates prioritise such over development – Asiedu Nketiah
31 mins -
NDF engages mineral extraction communities in advocacy and litigation resolution
35 mins -
Adabraka community in A/R unites to combat electoral violence
43 mins -
Forestry Commission cracks down on endangered bush meat trade
44 mins -
Global GDP could plunge by 24% by 2,100 without urgent climate action
44 mins -
High Court dismisses lecturer’s bid to block Deputy IGP’s appointment
53 mins -
MTN records 35.5% growth in profit to GH¢3.76bn in quarter 3, 2024
1 hour -
Deloitte to hold training on navigating customs and excise duty Obligations
1 hour -
Akufo-Addo, Bawumia should have prioritised National Peace Campaign launch – Mahama
1 hour -
AGI works to clamp down on substandard foreign mattresses penetrating Ghanaian markets
1 hour -
Immigration Service intercepts 54 gallons of fuel
1 hour -
Ace Medical Insurance makes its mark at Ghana Club 100 Awards
1 hour -
Dafeamekpor takes Speaker to High Court to affirm vacant seats ruling
1 hour -
Government is not funding GMX music streaming platform – Director of Marketing
2 hours -
Energy sector not advancing enough – ACEP
2 hours