A U.S. appeals court upheld a federal law that bars migrants who are in the United States illegally from possessing guns, rejecting arguments by a Mexican man convicted of unlawfully having a handgun that the ban was unconstitutional.
A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said on Tuesday that the ban was still valid even after recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have expanded gun rights by requiring firearms restrictions to be in keeping with the nation's history and tradition.
The panel said those Supreme Court rulings did not unequivocally undermine an earlier decision by the 5th Circuit holding that the plain text of the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment does not encompass immigrants in the county illegally.
"We should not extend rights to illegal aliens any further than what the law requires," U.S. Circuit Judge James Ho, a conservative appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, wrote in a concurring opinion.
The ruling came in an appeal by Jose Paz Medina-Cantu, who had been arrested by U.S. Border Patrol agents in Texas in 2022 and charged with illegally possessing a handgun and unlawfully re-entering the country after being previously deported.
Medina-Cantu pleaded guilty and was sentenced last year to 15 months in prison, but he preserved the right to argue on appeal that the gun charge violated his right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment.
His lawyers based their argument on a landmark 2022 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority that established a new test for assessing whether modern firearm restrictions comply with the Second Amendment.
The court's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen required gun regulations to be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation." Many laws have been declared invalid following that decision.
Medina-Cantu's lawyers argued the ruling likewise undermined a 2011 decision by the 5th Circuit upholding the immigration-related ban as there was no historical tradition dating back to around when the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 of disarming people based solely on their immigration status.
But the three-judge panel said the Supreme Court's recent rulings on gun rights "did not unequivocally abrogate our precedent that the plain text of the Second Amendment does not encompass illegal aliens."
Medina-Cantu's lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.
Latest Stories
-
GPL 2024/25: Young Apostles looking to upset Nations FC in Wenchi
7 hours -
2024/25 Ghana League: Basake Holy Stars to host Dreams FC in Anyinase after shocking Hearts
8 hours -
I’ll soon take ownership of ‘What Do You Know?’ from GBC – Dan-Afari Yeboah
8 hours -
Life Lounge with Edem Knight-Tay: Paying school fees, providing shelter, meals, clothes, not enough
8 hours -
Two KNUST scientists invited to present at 2024 UN General Assembly Science Summit
9 hours -
Sarkodie is a much better stage performer than Lil Wayne – Andy Dosty
9 hours -
Galamsey: Gov’t will deploy river guards to protect water bodies – Mireku Duker
9 hours -
Election 2024: Review criteria for presidential aspirants – Asah-Asante to EC
9 hours -
President must chair committee on illegal mining -Austin Gamey
9 hours -
Power sector on the verge of collapse – Mahama
9 hours -
Akufo-Addo congratulates Efua Ghartey on election as first female GBA President
9 hours -
Photos from JoyNews/Ecobank 3rd mini Habitat Fair
10 hours -
Multimedia Kumasi celebrates former Relationship Manager for 25 years of dedicated service
10 hours -
Akufo-Addo commissions Jamestown Fishing Harbour
10 hours -
Alan Kyerematen to address 2nd Distinguished Speaker Series on FDI
10 hours