The Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, and Member of Parliament for Damongo Constituency, Samuel Abu Jinapor, has hit hard at the Minority Caucus in Parliament for invoking a censure motion on parochial and partisan interests.
He said censure motions are very serious parliamentary business, and are to be invoked in very serious cases that borders on the integrity of Ministers of State.
The Minister was contributing to the debate on a motion to censure the Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta.
The motion, which was filed by the Minority Caucus in Parliament, alleged, among others, that the Finance Minister had engaged in conflict interest, and had made unconstitutional withdrawals from the Consolidated Fund.
After the initial debate on the motion, the Speaker referred it to an eight-member committee to investigate the allegations and report to plenary.
The Committee presented its report on Thursday, 8th December, 2022, paving way for the final debate on the motion.
Contributing to the motion, Mr. Jinapor said censure motions were developed by the UK Parliament to replace impeachment proceedings against the executive, which was deemed cumbersome.
He said they were to be adopted only in the most grievous cases, as it leads to a Minister losing his office.
He said even though censure motions in the UK are used to remove Ministers, they are seldom used.
Referring to the practice in the United States, he said although the US Constitution allows Senate to censure its own members, since the American Constitution was adopted in 1789, the practice has been used only nine (9) times.
According to Mr. Jinapor, the allegations contained in the Minority’s censure motion do not meet the litmus test for censure motions.
Citing the case of Okudzeto Ablakwa v Obetsebi Lamptey, he said the Constitution has assigned the power to investigate allegations of conflict of interest to the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ).
He queried how allegations of conflict of interest, which has already been investigated by CHRAJ, could form a basis for a censure motion.
He said he was not surprised that the Committee established by the Speaker found that allegation as unmeritorious and asked the Finance Minister not to comment on same.
Touching on the other grounds, Mr. Jinapor said the Committee that investigated the allegations made no adverse findings against Mr. Ofori-Atta.
He called on the Minority not to set a bad precedent with the motion, which will eventually affect the efficient functioning of Government in future.
After the debate, the Majority Caucus walked out and did not take part in the voting. The motion was eventually lost after it failed to meet the required two-third threshold for a vote of censure to be passed.
Latest Stories
-
3 Central Region MCEs intensify cholera control efforts after 5 deaths
3 mins -
Bawumia’s 12 ‘Bold Steps’ to expand educational opportunities for all
4 mins -
Mahama criticises NPP for accumulating energy debt to pass on to next NDC gov’t
5 mins -
Agromonti empowers Techiman farmers with sustainable agriculture training in CSR event
10 mins -
Ghanaians deserve certificates for enduring hardship under NPP – Mahama
10 mins -
AG’s office needs 1,500 public attorneys for proper discharge of functions – Godfred Dame
12 mins -
Court sentences man to life imprisonment for murdering girlfriend; daughter
27 mins -
Bawumia’s $80 bn value claim for Spotify, false – Dubawa
38 mins -
GBA President calls for transparent and fair December election
53 mins -
November 8 not a public holiday – Interior Ministry
55 mins -
Policies the Church can promote to ensure every birth by a congregant is wanted, not unintended
58 mins -
Next NPP government to build new AG offices in all regions – Godfred Dame
1 hour -
Why corporate leadership can no longer be silent on sustainability
1 hour -
The Keeper’s Music unveils Neyty with new single ‘Most High God’
1 hour -
Bawumia outlines 8 initiatives to create 4 million jobs for youth if elected president
2 hours