https://www.myjoyonline.com/bog-intervention-alone-in-forex-market-cannot-ensure-lasting-cedi-stability/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/bog-intervention-alone-in-forex-market-cannot-ensure-lasting-cedi-stability/

The Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA) is warning that the Bank of Ghana’s intervention alone in the forex market cannot ensure lasting exchange rate stability without far-reaching reform measures.

After peaking at GH¢16.30 in October, the cedi declined to GH¢15.37 in November and further to GH¢14.70 in December.

The GHS/GBP and GHS/EUR rates followed similar patterns.

IEA said the rate decline was presumably due to stepped-up intervention by the Bank of Ghana before the 2024 election.

“In fact, by October, before the intervention, the GHS/USD had risen to GH¢16.30”, it mentioned.

“The question is whether the appreciation in the rate in November and December could be sustained. The fact is that, as indicated below, Bank of Ghana’s intervention alone cannot ensure a lasting exchange rate stability without far-reaching reform measures”, it added.

The year-to-date depreciation of the cedi against the dollar peaked at -27.1 in October 2024 before declining to -22.7% in November 2024 and further to -19.18% in December 2024.

The deprecation in 2024 followed a further depreciation of 27.8% in 2023.

Continuing, the economic think tank said the cedi has a history of chronic depreciation. This is the result of the persistent gap between foreign exchange (FX) demand and supply.

Closing the gap, it alluded, requires policies to limit FX demand and increase FX supply.

“On the FX demand side, it is necessary to actively promote domestic production of import substitutes to reduce demand for FX for imports; entrench fiscal and monetary discipline to reduce demand pressures in the economy, including demand for FX; and enforce domestic FX market regulations to reduce demand for FX”, it pointed out.

On the FX supply side, there is a need for active promotion of exports to increase supply of FX; promotion of remittances to increase supply of FX; and greater Ghanaian ownership of resources and economic assets to increase supply of FX in the economy”, it added.

It concluded that these proposals are not really new, except that “we do not seem to pay them the needed attention. This is the reason for reiterating them here”.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.