Speaker of Parliament, Alban Sumana Kingsford Bagbin, has reiterated his stance on ex-gratia payments to Article 71 officeholders, insisting it no longer serves its intended purpose.
According to him, the original intention behind ex-gratia payments for certain public servants and political officeholders was to combat corruption, but this is no longer the case in the current dispensation.
Speaking at a public forum in Kumasi to mark the 30th anniversary of the Fourth Republican Parliament, Alban Bagbin emphasised that the payments were initially to assure public servants and political officeholders that their needs would be taken care of after leaving office, encouraging them to prioritize the people’s interests over personal gain.
However, he acknowledged that in practice, this has not been the case, and the payments have not effectively curbed corruption.
The Speaker expressed his support for amending Article 71 of the Constitution to abolish ex-gratia payments, which he believes have become unnecessary.
“The issue of ex gratia is a very thorny issue. The founders envisaged a situation where they wanted some particular category of public servants, including political officeholders. The ex gratia is not for members of Parliament and it’s not even ex gratia, it’s gratuity.
There’s a difference between ex gratia and gratuity and it’s not for members of parliament alone. It cuts through a category of public servants and political officeholders, including auditor general, including the chairpersons of all the constitutional commissions, including ministers of state, the presidency, judiciary, and all others, it’s not just members of parliament.”
“But the concept was to assure them, because of the importance of the position they occupy, and the decisions they take on your behalf, the concept was to assure them, don’t think about yourself, think about the people you represent because, after your office, we will take care of you. So it was to assist us to contain corruption. And I’m happy that a number of industrial chiefs from this region were members of the consultative assembly.”
“Unfortunately, in practice, it has not served its purpose. It has not been able to assist us to curb or contain corruption. And so when I made an attempt to contest as a presidential candidate, I did announce that if elected as president, I was going to ensure that that article is amended from the constitution. So I agree totally with anybody who comes to say that we should do away with Article 71 of the Constitution. It hasn’t served its purpose, there’s no use maintaining it.”
Latest Stories
-
Body found in search for child missing in croc attack
7 mins -
Komenda College receives donation of computers
18 mins -
Fidelity Bank announces GH¢1m GreenTech Innovation Challenge grant fund
3 hours -
Kamala Harris top choice to replace Joe Biden if he steps aside, sources say
3 hours -
We are behind schedule in implementing flooding prevention measures – Kojo Oppong Nkrumah
4 hours -
Osaka beaten by Navarro as Gauff goes through
4 hours -
Egypt’s Sisi names new armed forces chief of staff, defence minister
5 hours -
GUTA calls for immediate withdrawal of 5% excise tax on plastic manufacturing companies
5 hours -
NIA staff petition Akufo-Addo calling for head of Prof Attafuah
5 hours -
Uefa investigating Turkey’s Demiral over goal celebration
5 hours -
Sinner wins epic Italian showdown against Berrettini
5 hours -
Manchester United to cut 250 jobs
5 hours -
Foden ‘feels sorry’ for under-pressure Southgate
6 hours -
If he’s given the ‘steer,’ where will Napo sit? Ayariga asks Bawumia
6 hours -
Masterpiece found in plastic bag sells for £17.5m
6 hours