There was drama during Friday’s hearing of the NDC’s petition at the Supreme Court contesting the outcome of the 2020 general election.
The party's General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketiah took the apex court down memory lane to his days as a teacher when he employed the help of a calculator to crosscheck the Presidential results from the Eastern Region.
“I can confirm that the totals are not the aggregate of the numbers there but I don’t remember the actual figure that I got. If the court will permit me, we can add and find out what it is,” he said during his cross-examination.
Developments from here onwards would throw the court into moments of frenzy as the proceedings wore on.
“My lord it will be very difficult to cross-check the figures without a calculator, especially, when our mobile phones have also been taken away from us,” he responded to come discrepancies highlighted by the EC’s lawyer, Justin Amenuvor.
This was subsequently followed by suggestions by lawyers for the first respondent that the petitioner's witness was aware that the EC's results from Techiman South constituency would still leave Nana Akufo-Addo as the winner of the December polls.
The petitioner, John Mahama is, as part of his petition contending that, the EC erred in its tally of the results of the constituency figures, forming the basis for its decision to reject the total tally.
The EC’s lawyer, Justin Amenuvor insisted that the witness was aware of the results of the said constituency at the time of filing his witness statement which he believes rendered the petitioner’s analysis flawed.
This was rejected by the NDC chief scribe.
While doing the arithmetic in the witness box, the momentarily disoriented witness wondered why the device did not work as smoothly as he wanted.
His reaction to this challenge caused even elicited more humor from the gathering.
Eventually, he was successful in his computations and the hearing continued.
At another point, one of the judges had pled with Mr Nketiah to take a seat and feel convenient enough to go through the proceedings.
But he responded; "I am comfortable, I am a teacher my lord," which caused another outburst in the court.
By close of day, the Supreme Court struck out portions of the statement submitted to it by the General Secretary.
The lead counsel for the second respondent (President Akufo-Addo), Akoto Ampaw, had argued that 10 paragraphs in Mr Asiedu Nketia’s statement should be deleted as they are “not based on the pleadings of the petitioner, unduly prejudicial and scandalous”.
The case has been adjourned to February 1, 2021.
Latest Stories
-
Political parties should plan for losses, not just wins – IGP advises
7 seconds -
524 Diasporan Africans granted Ghanaian citizenship in ceremony
2 mins -
Mahama urges Afram Plains North residents to avoid ‘skirt and blouse’ voting
3 mins -
Asantehene receives more 19th century gold ornament and regalia
11 mins -
Hohoe Ghana Blind Union organises training for members ahead of Election 2024
17 mins -
Alan Kyerematen reveals his future plans for Ghanaian Health professionals
18 mins -
AAIN empowers women and small enterprises in Upper East Region through SHINE project
19 mins -
Akufo-Addo leads nationwide commissioning of 80 educational projects
25 mins -
Ghana and Seychelles strengthen bilateral ties with focus on key sectors
56 mins -
National Elections Security Taskforce meets political party heads ahead of December elections
60 mins -
Samsung’s AI-powered innovations honored by Consumer Technology Association
1 hour -
Fugitive Zambian MP arrested in Zimbabwe – minister
2 hours -
Town council in Canada at standstill over refusal to take King’s oath
2 hours -
Trump picks Pam Bondi as attorney general after Matt Gaetz withdraws
2 hours -
Providing quality seeds to farmers is first step towards achieving food security in Ghana
2 hours