A Kumasi-based Lawyer, Akwasi Afrifa, who accused the Chief Justice, Kwesi Anin-Yeboah, of demanding a $5 million bribe, has defended his claims.
Speaking to the press after several hours of interrogation at the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service on Monday, he said, “I have not done anything wrong. If you look at the accusations against me, I have given my response. The response is now public knowledge.”
Mr Akwasi Afrifa arrived at the CID Headquarters at about 9 am on Monday and left the premises later at 2 pm.
He, however, turned down calls to make further submissions on the matter.
His presence at the CID Headquarters follows the Chief Justices' request to the Criminal Investigations Department to investigate the said matter.
Mr Akwasi Afrifa, Esq, in response to an invitation by the General Legal Council, alleged that his former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwesi Atta IV informed him that Chief Justice Kwesi Annin-Yeboah, “demanded a bribe of ¢5,000,000 for a successful outcome of his case and that he had already paid ¢500,000 to the Chief Justice.”
The case under reference is OGYEEDOM OBRANU KWESI ATTA IV V GHANA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY & LANDS COMMISSION.
But in a letter to the Inspector General of Police dated July 12, signed by the Judicial Secretary, Justice Cynthia Pamela Addo, the Chief Justice dismissed allegations levelled against him, to the effect that he demanded a $5million bribe to influence a case pending before the Supreme Court.
The letter also noted that “His Lordship is saddened that without any shred of evidence, his name has been dragged into this sordid and potentially criminal matter.”
On the said matter, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) has called on Parliament to invoke Article 278 of the 1992 Constitution to compel President Akufo-Addo, to establish a Commission of Inquiry to probe the $5million bribery allegation.
General Secretary of the party, Johnson Asiedu Nketia, explained that the Chief Justice, who is the accused in the said matter, cannot be the very authority to set up a committee to investigate and declare judgement.
“The difficulty, however, with is this is that the investigations would concern the Chief Justice who is the subject of the bribery allegation in this matter and in whom disciplinary authority against judicial officers is vested under section 18 of the Judicial Service Act.
Therefore, good governance dictates that the Chief Justice steps aside during the pendency of the investigations by the Judicial Service relative to the issue of alleged misconduct on his part, as a Supreme Court Judge,” he stated.
Latest Stories
-
3 Central Region MCEs intensify cholera control efforts after 5 deaths
3 mins -
Bawumia’s 12 ‘Bold Steps’ to expand educational opportunities for all
5 mins -
Mahama criticises NPP for accumulating energy debt to pass on to next NDC gov’t
5 mins -
Agromonti empowers Techiman farmers with sustainable agriculture training in CSR event
11 mins -
Ghanaians deserve certificates for enduring hardship under NPP – Mahama
11 mins -
AG’s office needs 1,500 public attorneys for proper discharge of functions – Godfred Dame
12 mins -
Court sentences man to life imprisonment for murdering girlfriend; daughter
27 mins -
Bawumia’s $80 bn value claim for Spotify, false – Dubawa
38 mins -
GBA President calls for transparent and fair December election
53 mins -
November 8 not a public holiday – Interior Ministry
55 mins -
Policies the Church can promote to ensure every birth by a congregant is wanted, not unintended
58 mins -
Next NPP government to build new AG offices in all regions – Godfred Dame
1 hour -
Why corporate leadership can no longer be silent on sustainability
1 hour -
The Keeper’s Music unveils Neyty with new single ‘Most High God’
1 hour -
Bawumia outlines 8 initiatives to create 4 million jobs for youth if elected president
2 hours