Akim Abuakwa South legislator Samuel Atta Akyea voiced his opposition to the idea that MPs should be forced to vacate their seats simply because they express future political intentions.
In a passionate discussion on Joy News’ PM Express on Tuesday, October 16, he stressed that MPs should not be treated as “robots” incapable of changing their minds or contemplating their future political paths.
Atta Akyea’s comments followed discussions in Parliament surrounding some MPs who have declared their intention to contest as independent candidates in the upcoming 2024 parliamentary elections.
The private legal practitioner argued that such declarations do not equate to crossing the proverbial political carpet and that MPs should have the freedom to express their future intentions without affecting their current status.
“The issue here is that these MPs are addressing their future intentions. They’ve not said that as of now they want to abandon where they are for any other direction,” Atta Akyea explained, referencing the Second Deputy Speaker’s announcement of future plans.
“Should it affect my current status if I declare my intentions for the future? I’ve not said now I’m crossing to another party.”
For Atta Akyea, it is important to make a clear distinction between present commitments and future aspirations.
“What we are saying now is that they are not crossing the carpet yet. They are not saying that in this Parliament, they were sponsored by the NPP or came in as independents and now want to go to another party or stand as independents.”
He strongly opposed the notion that such future intentions should lead to immediate consequences, such as MPs being stripped of their seats, likening such an approach to reducing MPs to unthinking entities.
“If not, then we are reducing the members of Parliament to robots. They can’t think, they can’t change their minds,” he warned.
Atta Akyea also pointed out that intentions can change, and it is unreasonable to pre-emptively judge MPs based on a future possibility. “What if what they want to do, they change their minds about? Is Parliament going to declare on the thinking and feelings of MPs? That’s the problem I have,” he said, emphasising the need for flexibility in politics and decision-making.
This argument sheds light on a larger issue of parliamentary autonomy and freedom of expression.
Atta Akyea’s perspective challenges the rigidity of some interpretations of parliamentary conduct, promoting the idea that MPs must retain their freedom to think, express intentions, and change course without undue punishment.
Latest Stories
-
Small Scale Miners launch attack on illegal mining operators in support of ‘Operation Halt’
2 mins -
Chief Biney criticises Akufo-Addo’s political posturing amid galamsey crisis
4 mins -
Over 2,000 mining and related licenses issued since 2017
8 mins -
Frimpong-Manso Institute describes galamsey as ecocide, calls for urgent action to stop environmental destruction
10 mins -
Proposed VRA-BUI merger: Why are the bills still on the agenda? – John Jinapor quizzes
19 mins -
Ghana’s cocoa exports set to crash below $2 billion this year — lowest in 14 years!
29 mins -
Five students arrested for gang-rape at Mpraeso SHS; 3 on the run
32 mins -
Sunon Asogli Power shuts down due to $259m debt owed by ECG
37 mins -
ECG enhances PowerApp to address billing challenges
44 mins -
Animaxfyb Studios’ ‘Room 5’ selected for CANEX Shorts Competition
44 mins -
Galamsey: Ghana must protect its natural wealth from greed – Casely Hayford Hall
1 hour -
A betrayal of duty: The EC’s flawed disqualification process and the chairperson’s alarming response
1 hour -
NDC intensifies campaign in Ho Central Constituency
1 hour -
Nadia Buari makes comeback with ‘Forever in a Night’
1 hour -
Joy Sports Invitational: Peeva Beverages eager to make an impact
1 hour