I am not an expert in etymology, but etymologically, the word ‘husband’ is defined as a man (or male) in a marital relationship. Man or Male in this context is etymologically defined in terms of the physical and gender characteristics of the person.
The reverse is etymologically true of the word, ‘wife’.
As I said earlier, I’m not an etymology expert. But, I do know that while the meaning of words, over time, can be expanded to cover new developments and changing culture, the new phenomenon is often similar in nature and characteristics, thus making it easier for users of the word to identify it with the new developments or changing culture, without creating confusion in the minds of society and especially new learners of the language.
In the definition of ‘husband’, etymologically, a man refers to an individual of a specific gender and physical attributes. The same applies to a woman, in the definition of ‘wife’. Those specific gender and physical attributes of man and woman do not change (even if you want to include a transgender person), and therefore etymologically, the definition of husband and wife also do not change.
It is my strong opinion that, etymologically, the word ‘husband’ can ONLY refer to a married man (a person of the male gender and physical attributes). Similarly, the word ‘wife’ can ONLY refer to a married woman (a person of the female gender and physical attributes).
Any attempt to force a new meaning of husband and wife on society in order to accommodate lesbian and gay couples is etymologically wrong and only creates confusion in the minds of people, especially young learners of the language. If this is deliberately being done to force the indoctrination of same-sex marriage on society, that’s equally wrong and unacceptable. Forcing the media to use phrases like ‘her wife’ and ‘his husband’ is unacceptable and etymologically wrong and disingenuous.
You can find a new lexicon to describe your new legal relationships, but you cannot have a world where one word can mean two things that are diametrically opposite to each other in nature and characteristics! We cannot have a world where we define a man as both a male and a female. And if a man cannot be defined to include a female, then a husband can also not be defined as a man or woman in a marital relationship.
Latest Stories
-
NDC opens nominations for Akwatia parliamentary primaries on July 28
36 minutes -
Guinness Ghana DJ Awards opened new doors for my career – DJ Pho
58 minutes -
Mohammed Sukparu commits to advancing Ghana’s Artificial Intelligence agenda
1 hour -
‘What is coding?’ – Question raises eyebrows during Deputy Communication Minister-nominee’s hearing
2 hours -
WAFCON 2024: Ghana’s Black Queens claim third-place after penalty win over South Africa
2 hours -
Ghana celebrates 100-year-old WWII veteran Joseph Ashitey Hammond
2 hours -
Measures announced in Mid-Year Budget Review fully in line with programme objectives – IMF
2 hours -
This Saturday on Newsfile: AG drops charges in uniBank trial, Aud-General’s report, and Mid-Year Budget Review
3 hours -
Parliament passes Road Maintenance Trust Fund Bill
3 hours -
Heavy security deployed at Manhyia Palace following Asawase shootings
3 hours -
Kumawu MP Ernest Anim urges Parliament to act on crisis in Ghana’s prisons
4 hours -
Kumawu MP decries ‘Inhumane’ feeding rate in Ghana’s prisons
4 hours -
Mahama appeals for calm in Nkwanta, condemns recent killings
5 hours -
Ghana Career and Migration Fair 2025 launched to prepare youth for the future of work
5 hours -
Mfantsiman Old Girls’ Association to hold National Health Walk on August 2
5 hours