An Accra High Court has ruled that Government acted lawfully when it terminated its agreement with Power Distribution Services Limited (PDS) regarding the management of the power distributor, ECG.
This is the case in which PDS had contended that the termination of the agreement was unlawful.
Government in July 2018 entered into two agreements that resulted in handing ECG assets worth billions of dollars to PDS. This empowered ECG to undertake the distribution of electricity in the Southern part of Ghana.
This formed part of government’s commitment to the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) compact with the United States of America, which required that it undertakes private sector participation (PSP) in the energy sector with the object of ensuring efficiency in the management, operation and investments in the electricity distribution business of ECG.
In order for the agreement to take off, PDS had to meet certain conditions, key amongst them being the provision of a demand guarantee or a letter of credit raised by a qualified bank.
PDS submitted Payment Securities in the form of Demand Guarantees issued by a Qatari insurance firm, Al Koot Insurance and Reinsurance (Al Koot) on February 27, 2019, two days before the Transfer Date of March 1, 2019.
Efforts by ECG to confirm the Demand Guarantees issued by ECG resulted in the receipt of a letter dated 16th June, 2019 from Al Koot by which Al Koot denied the validity of the Demand Guarantees.
The Government of Ghana and ECG consequently, by letters dated July 31, 2019, suspended the three agreements pending the conduct of a full inquiry into the circumstances of the letter written by Al Koot.
Upon completion of their investigations, on October 23, 2019, the Government of Ghana acting through the Energy Commission, cancelled the licenses issued to PDS and ordered a transfer of ECG’s assets back to ECG.
The decision was explained by the Government of Ghana as intended to safeguard the assets of ECG worth tens of billions of dollars.
In February 2020, PDS dragged government to court claiming reliefs including
“A declaration that the suspension or cancellation of the Operating Licences comprising the Electricity Distribution Licence and Electricity Retail Sale Licence of the Applicant by the Respondent as per its letter dated July 30, 2019, is inconsistent with the condition precedent of prior hearing required by the Energy Commission Act, 1997 (Act 541) and therefore unlawful and void.
A declaration that the purported cancellation of the Operating Licences comprising Electricity Distribution Licence and Electricity Retail Sale Licence of the Applicant by the Respondent as per its letter dated July 31, 2019, contrary to the requirement of prior hearing as stipulated in the Energy Commission Act, 1997 (Act 541) is unlawful and therefore void.
A declaration that the purported transfer and appointment of the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) as Operator under the Electricity Sale Licence number EC/ESL/02-19-001 of the Applicant by the Respondent per its letter dated July 31, 2019 without prior meeting with and consent of the Shareholders and Lenders of the Applicant as well as an invalidation of the licences as required by the terms of the licence and the Energy Commission Act, 1997 (Act 541) is unlawful and therefore void.
A declaration that the Respondent’s cancellation of the Operating Licences comprising the Electricity Distribution Licence and Electricity Retail Licence of the Applicant as per its letter dated October 23, 2019, contrary to the minutes of Meeting dated September 6, 2019, was unreasonable and in breach of legitimate expectation.
A declaration that the Respondent’s cancellation of the operating licences comprising the Electricity Distribution licence and Electricity Retail Sale Licence of the Applicant and the issuance of new Electricity Distribution Licence and Electricity Retail Sale Licence covering the same Southern Distribution Zone to the Electricity Company of Ghana when a Complaint was pending before the Minister was unlawful and the purported gazetting of the same void as such gazetting and any other publication is proscribed by the provisions of the Energy Commission Act, 1997 (Act 541) and therefore void.
A declaration that the exercise of administrative power by the Respondent in cancelling of Electricity Distribution and Retail Sale licences results from the Respondent’s acceptance of Electricity Company of Ghana’s rendition of the provisions of the Transaction Agreements regarding post-termination transitional period and rights of the Applicant under the Transaction Agreements abridged the Applicant’s rights.
An order of certiorari directed at the Respondent to bring before the Court and quash all unlawful publications made of the withdrawal/suspension and/or cancellation of the Applicant’s Operating Licences regarding the Southern Distribution Zone.
An order of certiorari directed at the Respondent to bring before the Court and quash all unlawful publications made of the issuance of new Operating Licences namely Electricity Distribution Licence No. EC/EDL/02-19-002 and Electricity Retail Sale Licence No. EC/ESL/02-19-002 in the name of Electricity Company of Ghana.
An order directed at the Respondent for the restoration of the Applicant’s Electricity Distribution and Electricity Retail Sale Licences pending the expiration of the post-termination transitional period under the Transaction Agreements or in the alternative compensatory damages for the unlawful suspension and or cancellation of the Applicant’s Licences.
An order of injunction directed at the Respondent and its servants, agents to refrain from interfering with the Applicant’s post-termination transitional rights provided under the Lease and Assignment Agreement (LAA).”
The Attorney-General’s Office opposed the PDS case. The office insisted that the action by PDS was without any basis and unwarranted within the specific circumstances of the facts leading to PDS’ action.
The A-G asserted that most of the reliefs claimed by PDS related to steps taken by the respondent to give the applicant a hearing, before the Government proceeded to take the final decision to cancel the PDS’ licences by a letter dated October 23, 2019, and could therefore not be the object of a relief in a judicial review application.
The High Court presided over by Justice Akua Sarpomaa Amoa on July 2, dismissed all of ECG’s reliefs and indicated that the full reason would be filed in the registry of the court.
Joy News sources say government is set to go after funds belonging to the state which PDS is said to have earlier refused to release.
Latest Stories
-
Elon Musk is sued over $1m election giveaway
2 hours -
US official sees little voting disruption tied to foreign interference
2 hours -
Nigeria court frees 119 protesters after government drops charges
2 hours -
French families sue TikTok over harmful content
2 hours -
Slapping MP shows generational change may not end abuse of power in Nigeria
2 hours -
Zimbabwe bans police from using mobile phones while on duty
2 hours -
Killers of Ugandan Olympian sentenced to 35 years
3 hours -
Elon Musk to spend election night with Donald Trump
3 hours -
Accusations fly in Spain over who is to blame for flood disaster
3 hours -
UCL: Real Madrid lose to AC Milan in second straight home defeat
3 hours -
Queen Camilla cancels events due to chest infection
3 hours -
Economy is growing below potential – IEA
3 hours -
UCL: Gyokeres hat-trick as Amorim’s Sporting thrash Man City
3 hours -
Equatorial Guinea VP warns against office sex after viral videos
3 hours -
Netflix Europe offices raided in tax fraud probe
3 hours