The prosecution on the case of the Managing Director of the National Investment Bank (NIB) Mr Daniel Charles Gyimah have replaced charges preferred against the defendant. The earlier charge of willfully causing financial loss has been replaced with attempting to cause financial loss to the state and forgery of document have been preferred against him. Lawyers of the embattled MD have accused the state prosecutors of acting in bad faith. Joy reporter Benard Nasara Saibu witnessed proceedings in court on Friday and reported that Mr Gyimah’s lawyer, Alex Johson, had argued that the prosecution amended the charge sheet without giving prior notice to the defence. The lead prosecutor Daniel D.K. Frimpong, according to Benard, made an oral application to the presiding judge Justice D.E.K. Djakete asking for portions of the charge sheet to be amended. The judge is said to have upheld the application which was made to him and consequently the charges preferred against Mr Gyimah read as: Attempting to wilfully cause financial loss to the state by using NIB to guarantee a loan without the prior approval of the NIB board, and forging documents in respect of the transaction between the NIB and Eland International. Following the ruling, lawyers of Mr Gyimah rose to their feet to register their displeasure at the judge’s decision. According to them they had been served an unfair treatment, the prosecution influencing an amendment of the charge sheet without giving prior notification to the defence. They described the action of the prosecution as unhealthy and asked the judge to intervene for the prosecution to do the right thing. But Mr Frimpong, prosecuting, argued that the prosecution was not under a bail of indictment by which they were obliged to inform Daniel Gyimah of the amendment. According to him, that notwithstanding, the prosecution had earlier cautioned Mr Gyimah on a possible amendment, stressing, that constituted enough notification and that it was necessary for Mr Gyimah’s lawyers to that into consideration. Debate in the courtroom following the disagreements took on a bitter turn when the defence expressed disquiet about what they said had been the slow spate of proceedings since Mr Gyimah was arrested five weeks ago and “unlawfully” detained. They called on the prosecution to get their acts right to enable the defence to prove its innocence. The prosecution has it that on May 7, 2007 Gyimah unilaterally entered into an agreement with Eland International (Ghana) Limited in which he used NIB as a guarantor and issued 30 promissory notes valued at 60 million dollars. The promissory notes were to mature on January 29, this year. The judge subsequently called for an adjournment. Mr Gyimah reappears in court on March 27, 2009. Meanwhile lead prosecutor Mr Frimpong hinted that Attorney General and Minister of Justice Madam Betty Mould-Iddrisu might soon step in to handle the case involving Mr Gyimah. He did not give reasons for the possible replacement. Story by Fiifi Koomson